how to get federal student loans
free criminal background check indiana
loan calculator by payment
payday advance installment loans
cash 2010
current auto loan rates
pay off loan calculator
key bank student loans
jobs you can apply for online
mortgage approval

In 1996, one of the Guiding Lights, and “Deep Conservative Thinkerers,” Newt Gingrich, outlined a strategy and a fundamental need for the Republicans to control language in order to win the war of ideas and exert control.

You can find a copy of his memo here, and in the event that it should vanish, I will make a copy of the entire thing on this site (as a footnote to this piece).

I think it’s safe to say that conservatives have taken this lesson to heart, and made it such a central part of their strategery that they do it reflexively these days. Certainly you see its effects on a daily basis on the Republican “News” Network, and all the communications properties that exist inside the Fox Bubble.

It seems to have also become ingrained in the psyche of rank and file conservatives as well.

Just yesterday, I was speaking to a conservative poster about gay marriage. The flow of the conversation went like this:

DD3075: Come on now, everyone knows the difference between “birth” parents and “adopted” parents.

I see a radical minority that is asking to redefine words to accommodate their choices in living arrangements. Not only do they want to change the definition of “marriage”, now they would like to change the definition of “birth parents”.

“Birth parents” are one thing. “Adoptive parents” are something else.

Let’s see, if a man marries a woman who already has a child by another man, does he have the “right” to put his name on the birth certificate? NO. He can become an adoptive parent to the child, but he will never be the “birth” parent. Same goes for gays.

Simple as that.

As for Romney, he never said a thing against adoptive parents or families made from adoptions.

Me: I’m pretty sure they don’t give a $hit what you call it…they’re not interested in how these terms appear in Merriam Webster…what they WANT are the same rights straight folks have when THEY get married, and not to get castigated for different beliefs by angry, ignorant guys with pitchforks.

That’s not a hugely radical concept, really. To live…in peace, without some Fundie looming over them.

Shocking.

DD3075: So tell us all, Vel…..

if: “they don’t give a $hit what you call it…they’re not interested in how these terms appear in Merriam Webster…what they WANT are the same rights”

then: why doesn’t the radical gay community develop a term that indicates a religious or civil union of gays?

That term could then be added to documents where they feel they are not acknowledged as lifetime partners. They usually bring up hospital visits. Or financial documents.

Me: I will answer your question with a question…if we already have a word that signifies what they want to do, why should they have to? Develop a whole new language, I mean?

Their usage of the word is nothing to you…doesn’t mean YOU can’t use the same word, doesn’t detract in any way from using the same word. We use the same words nationwide…my use of them does not preclude yours….does it?

I don’t own the words. I don’t have a monopoly on them, so who am I to tell you that you can, or cannot use them? I don’t even understand why that’s part of the discussion.

It’s a word. You don’t own it, and I’m not going to LET you tell me I can’t use it if I want to.

Just like you’re not gonna let me control YOUR use of words.

Right?

Here’s an example of what I mean:

One of your fellow conservative posters, Yourmamatoo, uses the words “economic freefall” to describe the current condition of the economy.

We can’t insist that she invent a whole new language to describe the economy, even tho, by any SANE measure, the economy most assuredly is NOT “in an economic freefall.”

She is, nonetheless, free to use that set of words to describe it, is she not?

Tell you what…if you feel that strongly about it, raise some money, convince a judge to enforce your purchase of the word.

Then you can control its usage. Until you do that, pardon the French, but if you try to tell me what words to use and how to use them, I’m likely to tell you to F**k off. (unless you purchase that one too, of course. :) )

In the end, this is more of the same conservative projection I’ve talked about time and time again.

“YOU (liberals, which itself has been redefined to mean, “anybody to the left of Limbaugh”) are not allowed to redefine words. That’s our thing,” and sadly, it has led to a twisted realm of thought where corporations, zygotes and even stem cells are “people” to the folk on the right, being gay is a choice, but rape is a gift from god (and even then, in the conservative mind, there’s an apparent distinction between “Legitimate Rape” and…”Illegitimate Rape?”), and where actual (poor) people are animals (note the the four different republican politicans here aren’t just some isolated pocket in a backwater part of the country…they’re pretty much everywhere, hailing from South Carolina, Nebraska, Arizona and Minnesota…a pretty fair cross section of the nation)

This is what the Republican party has become.

People are animals, gay’s made bad choices, rape is a gift from the Almighty, and everything from soulless corporations to zygotes to stem cells are people.

As disturbing as the above is, it is perhaps not surprising, being the natural next step in the chain when you reject math, science, and data as being part of a global conspiracy, and want to remove the teaching of critical thinking skills from schools.

These people would make the Puritans look like a bunch of radical hippies.

They are as ignorant as they are dangerous, and their beliefs are as poisonous as their failed economic policies, which have now been responsible for both of America’s worst economic crisis.

It has to stop, and We, the People, have to stop it.

-=Vel=-

Here’s Newt’s Article, referenced above:

.Language: A Key Mechanism of Control

Newt Gingrich’s 1996 GOPAC memo

As you know, one of the key points in the GOPAC tapes is that “language matters.” In the video “We are a Majority,” Language is listed as a key mechanism of control used by a majority party, along with Agenda, Rules, Attitude and Learning. As the tapes have been used in training sessions across the country and mailed to candidates we have heard a plaintive plea: “I wish I could speak like Newt.”

That takes years of practice. But, we believe that you could have a significant impact on your campaign and the way you communicate if we help a little. That is why we have created this list of words and phrases.

This list is prepared so that you might have a directory of words to use in writing literature and mail, in preparing speeches, and in producing electronic media. The words and phrases are powerful. Read them. Memorize as many as possible. And remember that like any tool, these words will not help if they are not used.

While the list could be the size of the latest “College Edition” dictionary, we have attempted to keep it small enough to be readily useful yet large enough to be broadly functional. The list is divided into two sections: Optimistic Positive Governing words and phrases to help describe your vision for the future of your community (your message) and Contrasting words to help you clearly define the policies and record of your opponent and the Democratic party.

Please let us know if you have any other suggestions or additions. We would also like to know how you use the list. Call us at GOPAC or write with your suggestions and comments. We may include them in the next tape mailing so that others can benefit from your knowledge and experience.

Optimistic Positive Governing Words

Use the list below to help define your campaign and your vision of public service. These words can help give extra power to your message. In addition, these words help develop the positive side of the contrast you should create with your opponent, giving your community something to vote for!
active(ly)
activist
building
candid(ly)
care(ing)
challenge
change
children
choice/choose
citizen
commitment
common sense
compete
confident
conflict
control
courage
crusade
debate
dream
duty
eliminate good-time in prison
empower(ment)
fair
family
freedom
hard work
help
humane
incentive
initiative
lead
learn
legacy
liberty
light
listen
mobilize
moral
movement
opportunity
passionate
peace
pioneer
precious
premise
preserve
principle(d)
pristine
pro- (issue): flag, children, environment, reform
prosperity
protect
proud/pride
provide
reform
rights
share
strength
success
tough
truth
unique
vision
we/us/our
Contrasting Words

Often we search hard for words to define our opponents. Sometimes we are hesitant to use contrast. Remember that creating a difference helps you. These are powerful words that can create a clear and easily understood contrast. Apply these to the opponent, their record, proposals and their party.
abuse of power
anti- (issue): flag, family, child, jobs
betray
bizarre
bosses
bureaucracy
cheat
coercion
“compassion” is not enough
collapse(ing)
consequences
corrupt
corruption
criminal rights
crisis
cynicism
decay
deeper
destroy
destructive
devour
disgrace
endanger
excuses
failure (fail)
greed
hypocrisy
ideological
impose
incompetent
insecure
insensitive
intolerant
liberal
lie
limit(s)
machine
mandate(s)
obsolete
pathetic
patronage
permissive attitude
pessimistic
punish (poor …)
radical
red tape
self-serving
selfish
sensationalists
shallow
shame
sick
spend(ing)
stagnation
status quo
steal
taxes
they/them
threaten
traitors
unionized
urgent (cy)
waste
welfare

Update #1:
Apparently, “Yourmamatoo” didn’t like me poking fun at her for describing the current state of the economy as being “in freefall.” It came up in conversation here, and in her usual, snarky style, she basically called me a liar. She’s “never” used that term. Not once, and I’m just making up my own facts.

Well….I don’t take kindly to people calling me a liar, and I’ll admit, I was mad about it…was gonna find where she said it, post the screen shots of it and call her a lying sack of canine excrement, or something comparable, but you know what? I’m over it, and besides that, this is exactly the sort of blatant dishonesty and desperate denialism I’m talking about, so why stay mad? If anything, she’s helped me demonstrate just how untrustworthy these people are.

For that, “Yourmamatoo,” I’d like to say thank you. And your screenies are below. Have a wonderful day! :) (click image to view full size so its legible)

  • sazach

    Hey Vel,

    Thought you might get a chuckle out of a response from one of your favorit random cons, after quoting the above:

    yourmamatoo

    2 minutes ago

    @sazach @yourmamatoo

    I have never, not once used those words.

    Liberals- making up their own facts.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tom-Key/566887215 Tom Key

    Luntz did a focus group that showed that almost everyone wants a smaller government with lower taxes. So he told the GOP to claim they are for those things. In fact, however, the GOP has expanded government and raised taxes MORE than the Democrats, every time the GOP gets control.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tom-Key/566887215 Tom Key

    Another big linguistic tool was the GOP was taught to refer to the Wealthy/Rich (their funders) as “job creators”. David Stockman, Reagan’s only economist actually resigned in disgust over this lie — because there has never been evidence which justified slashing the taxes for the Wealthy. He has since written THREE books detailing the lies the GOP was telling. The tax relief provided to the Rich resulted in bigger Cayman Island accounts and fewer jobs created.

  • Velociryx

    Thank you for that! I posted pictorial proof (above) and let her know it was there….I HATE being called a liar. Sheesh. You don’t agree with my conclusions…that’s okay. You don’t like my methodology…fine. But I play fair. I use source data and explain my *exact* methodology, all the time, every time.

    Anyway, I doubt we’ll hear from her, but I greatly appreciate you pointing me to that thread!

    -=Vel=-

  • Velociryx

    That’s a true and valid point, Tom…in fact, the largest government expansion in history took place under the last R president, GW Bush…

    -=Vel=-

  • Velociryx

    Yep…excellent catch there, and you’re correct. The funny thing is…the middle class…every individual who goes about their daily lives, and by virtue of doing so, DEMANDS various goods and services is the real driving force behind economic growth…they’re the real “job creators,” so another good example of conservative linguistic mumbo-jumbo…

    -=Vel=-

  • sazach

    If opportunity knocks, I’ll be sure to point this out, gladly!

  • Velociryx

    Thank ya…not that we’ll change her mind (I’m sure we won’t…she’ll prolly fall back to “That wasn’t me…my account was hacked!” or something equally silly, but…we’ll see. :)

    -=Vel=-