Well have you ever been debating a subject in an Internet Blog intensely and all of a sudden your fellow debater tries for an empathy power play? This happened to me recently in an online political forum on the subject of gay and lesbian marriage when one online forum participant stated to me;

“Your increasing reasonableness earlier tonight, and just your willingness to talk and explain things, increased my respect for you. And then when you talked about your friend and gave hints about some of your own internal struggles, I felt some empathy for you and just wanted to share something with you.”

What had happened is I told her of an acquaintance who was gay who committed suicide about 20-years ago, a team mate on a sports team. But I noticed this game so I said;

“Oh dump it, I do not want empathy. I have no internal struggles, I have always had plenty of women in my life. Empathy, do I appear to weak to you, that I am in search of someone who cares? What is the deal here? Emotional manipulation turnover strategies, the death of my fellow teammate sucks but it was also 20 years ago. It was a waste totally, he was getting another 2-years full ride scholarship too, but all that is water under the bridge.”

Of course then this internal struggle BS really got me, as if suggesting I was gay or leaning that way, so I let her have a piece of my mind; “Personally I think a man sticking his member in the rectum of another man is similar to sticking it in a donut, which has been sitting in a luke warm bowl of feces for three days. Two women somehow does not seem so unnatural to me? Do not know why, just doesn’t. So, I have no problems here with any so called; “internal struggles,” look in the mirror.

Additionally what someone else does in their own time is their business not mine. I do not care. I really could care less if you all get married or not. But at the same time I know why the gay marriage thing is not coming to pass politically and it is not just because our current President has rallied the Christian Right for a stronger political base. It is because of the gay fringe and their persnickety-ness and verbal abuse and threats on heterosexuals.

“Lance Winslow” – Online Think Tank forum board. If you have innovative thoughts and unique perspectives, come think with Lance; www.WorldThinkTank.net/. Lance is an online writer in retirement.

Author: Lance Winslow
Article Source: EzineArticles.com
Healing food: natural way to cure cancer

Many people get online and get sucked into political forum debates, where one side rails against another. Then the name calling starts and degradation spirals out of control from there. Eventually people no longer use their real name or identity and then they are suddenly emboldened by the anonymity to say things they would never in a million years say in public.

The sound and fury is fun to participate in, yet having been involved in these things and then finding out I am debating with an anonymous poster who resorts to name calling is not so much fun. Indeed one has to ask them selves; are you sure you wish to beat your head against the wall, with others who disagree with you? I have noticed attacks on my personal and actual observations when the other debaters have failed to observe themselves and then basically spout party-line politics for issues they no nothing about.

Politics are more of a hobby for me, just something fun to think on, I never get too worked up over any of it. People just do not know what I know and have not seen all I have seen, so I understand that. And trying to convince someone with a closed mind of anything is a wasteful activity. You may find yourself in such debate online and you will remember what I have said. We must all agree that there are important issues we MUST address as a Nation because our security and on-going efforts to maintain our civilization and better it are at stake. There are serious topics we can all discuss online and we have come to far to throw it all away or backtrack now. Consider this in 2006.

“Lance Winslow” – Online Think Tank forum board. If you have innovative thoughts and unique perspectives, come think with Lance; www.WorldThinkTank.net/. Lance is an online writer in retirement.

Author: Lance Winslow
Article Source: EzineArticles.com
Electrical Pressure Cooker Online

Online Political Debates and Forums sure get out of hand quickly, as the debates so often turn to personal attacks. Of course when this happens all is lost as the issues become clouded and the purpose of the debate is lost. Online debate forums therefore need a strong set of moderators and collaboration between the moderators with specific and pre-defined guidelines, which must be adhered to.

That sounds time consuming and it can be extremely challenging, so each moderator must be certain that they can perform? They need to ask themselves; what have they ever done in their life that makes them believe that they are up for it? It is a lot of work. Often it is advised to have third party verifiers and third party research to back it up.

If an online debater posts a comment then at the end of each paragraph or every couple they should put reference links to the supporting data, not allowing them to put them at the end after the reader forgets. As these political commentators write innuendo after innuendo and then at the end quote a “news” article as if any of that is real. I have been in the “news” all my life and never once had the reporter got the story exactly correct.

http://www.carwashguys.com/history/museum1.shtml

http://www.carwashguys.com/innews.html

A moderator should check up on all the references and make sure they are valid, credible and support the comment. One also should ask; “Who is monitoring the monitors? Assuming they will be human? How can you trust them? People who are involved in Politics always have a motive and unless that motive is to better the country or providing for a safer and more efficient civilization then, well?

Ultimately one of the most important things is to keep such political forum or debate sites from becoming bitch sites. Or worse sounding boards for one side without consideration of an alternate point of view otherwise the debate is a wash in one-sided politics serving no free man. Additionally it is important to not jeopardize the integrity, articles, commentary or time of the debaters. This is why the monitoring of references and data in any and all online political debate forums is essential to the integrity of the website. We must consider all this in 2006.

“Lance Winslow” – Online Think Tank forum board. If you have innovative thoughts and unique perspectives, come think with Lance; www.WorldThinkTank.net/. Lance is an online writer in retirement.

Author: Lance Winslow
Article Source: EzineArticles.com
Canada duty

It is usually a membership site set up to discuss different events, differing opinions and breaking news in the field of politics. The better forums are those that have no political bias i.e. they are not pro Democrat or Republican but have been set up with the intention of encouraging open and honest debate with participants holding various viewpoints.

The owner and moderators on the site should encourage exchange of opinions as this will make the website more popular and hence will attract more traffic and resulting members. But they must also moderate the forum correctly. While arguments are common when anyone discusses politics, it shouldn’t be an excuse for one member to abuse another. The moderator’s role in a political forum is to prevent the discussion descending into personal attacks. At the same time they do not want to cut off an interesting argument. It is not an easy task but most people can tell the difference between someone who is expressing a viewpoint and those that are just trying to be disruptive.

There is a reason why you probably shouldn’t discuss sex, religion or politics at a party. People tend to hold very strong opinions on the subject. Some people educate themselves about the various issues and come to political forums to discuss these arguments. They are willing to listen to what the other people think and will on occasion be convinced by the discussion to change their mind on that particular issue.

But you also have those people who have followed a certain party because that is what their family always voted. They may not completely understand why they are a Democrat or a Republican but they will defend the policies of the relevant party to the last. These people tend to start quoting the Constitutional right to freedom of speech when you try to argue the point. Sometimes it is pointless trying to get into a debate with them and the best thing is to walk away and find political forums populated with people who are more open minded.

To read additional articles about the misadventures that can arise as a result of discussions in political forums, or to participate in problem-solving focused discussions about today’s issues, join us on our website: http://www.uvent.info/political-forums-and-the-changing-face-of-democracy

Author: Chris Hartpence
Article Source: EzineArticles.com
Creditcard Currency Conversion Fee

The emerging technologies are affecting politics in a mighty way. These technologies are turning out to be a substantial blow for established political parties. Everyday there are multiple breaking news stories that generate good discussion. These discussions are interesting because intrinsically every individual has a different political view.

The forum for discussions can sometimes change the angle of viewing an event. There are various thoughts that arise on hearing news in the ongoing in political arena. The politics have gone more intense over the past few years. The new news, coming out of an old one is in fashion today. The media does not let a topic close so easily. They try to engage people to present their views about a serious topic and keep on asking them to elaborate only till another issue arises out of any said statement.

It certainly does no good to the people or to the political parties. The media engages people for verbal fights, the consequences be damned. That is no way out to have a good discussion on any good topic. Better solution to have a sound discussion is to sign in a political forum and start a topic. Writing your views gives you an impartial chance to speak with your words without any interference. This also enables you to make others understand what you mean to say from a statement.

Political forums are a great way to interact and socialize with people you do not know. You can get to know about the views of a person who resides a 100 miles away from you and you can comment on what they say. Engaging in a conversation is easy and you can have the whole world listen to what you say. You can sign up for a free account in any forum, look around for the topic that you are interested in and start the conversation. You can also start a discussion on a new topic by starting it yourself.

Be a part of movement, express your views. You can get to learn about a topic about which you were previously unaware. The best thing about political forums is that you have various topics for discussion and you can present your views on all the topics you desire.

J. Rodrigues is an active member of an online political forum and always look for commenting on interesting political discussion. This helped her to know about latest political ongoing all over the States. Jinne regularly invites new people to the discussions to know their views about various political events.

Author: Jinne Rodrigues
Article Source: EzineArticles.com
Provided by: WordPress plugin Guest Blogger

Political Forums and the Changing Face of Democracy

Unless you’ve been living the last decade under a very large and weighty rock, there’s no way you’ve failed to notice that in a thousand different ways, the internet has changed pretty much everything about the way we live, work, and communicate with each other.

The rise of political forums on the net has, and is continuing to change the face of, and in fact, the very nature of democracy itself.

Some of these changes are for good, and others for ill, but that fact that it’s happening is undeniable. We’ll take a look at a few of the ways things are changing, try to shed at least a ray of light on the subject of political forums in general, then invite you to participate in our own political forums, right here on the site.

On the plus side, the biggest gain that the ordinary citizen sees, courtesy of political forums he or she may frequent is that politics has become more accessible and more personal than it has been since the Greek Polis’ first experimented with the concept.

In those days of course, the immediacy, accessibility, and “personal-ness” of democracy stemmed from the fact that the city states tended to be relatively small, and the policy matters discussed often concerned matters of immediate survival for these relatively isolated political units (what neighboring city-states to ally with, which rivals to attack, matters of trade, military service, etc…all of these were much more transparent to, and bore a much more personal and immediate effect for the ancient Greeks than they do for us today, where many of these things exist in our minds only as abstract concepts).

All that to say that while there are some parallels between the political forums attended by the ancient Greeks, and the virtual political forums that the masses are flocking to today, there are also some fundamental differences.

It is all very well that politics in general are a lot more accessible to the common man now, than they ever were before, but unfortunately, this is (or can be) something of a two-edged sword, because a little bit of knowledge can be a dangerous thing.

Through the ages, political forums of all types have, of course, been center stage for all manner of pundits and egoists, looking to sway the masses for their own ends, and this is certainly as true today as it was in our ancient past. One key difference here though, is that while the political forums of yesteryear saw their members all drawn from a relatively homogenous (and rather smallish) population, today’s popular political forums are massive things, and cater to a large, ever-changing, incredibly diverse population of participants. This being the case, of course it naturally follows that there’s a much broader spectrum of political belief to be found within the confines of one of our modern political forum than would have even been conceivable in the forums of old, and this, coupled with the anonymity that our modern political forums provide (ancient democracy was very much an “in-your-face” affair) opens the door for a great deal of verbal viciousness.

This is not to say that our forefathers did not have their fair share of vile, mud-slinging debates. They most certainly did, but these tended to be the exceptions, rather than the rule (and this is the reason they stand out so colorfully against the backdrop of the greater bulk of those ancient political debates). Contrast that with conversations in today’s political forums, where the battle lines are drawn going in (typically along Conservative vs. Liberal lines), and the debates get heated almost from the outset, and more often than not, quickly degenerate into mindless mud-slinging, with no one really remembering what the original debate topic actually was.

The second major negative to be found in today’s political forums is the fact that demagogues have access to a vast population of easily convinced, easily led people. This has literally launched a number of careers, and has led to some unfortunate consequences, with popular talk show hosts essentially supplanting the elected political leadership when it comes to creating policy planks and talking points. This is a danger to guard against not because the cult personalities are inherently bad people…the author makes no judgment either way. Simply that they’re not the elected representatives, and their undue influence over the masses is ANYTHING but democratic, but that is a whole different debate, and a topic for another time. Perhaps even a good topic for discussion on our own political forums, which you are cordially invited to join!

-=Vel=-
UVent Forums

Political Debate – Where Has All the Civility Gone?

There was a day when political debate carried with it the notion of civility. That it was possible to hold a political debate with a rival (even one from the opposite side of the political landscape) and hold an issues-driven conversation. Impassioned, certainly, but it used to be possible to hold a passionate conversation on any topic (political debate or otherwise) without seeing it devolve into mud slinging and name calling. Without seeing the parties from both sides stomp off in frustration and disgust, absolutely convinced that the person on the other side of the debate is a first rate moron (in the best case), or a traitorous enemy of his country (in the worst).

To say that this situation is not conducive to CONSTRUCTIVE political debate is understatement at its most sublime, and I would contend that it is, in fact, the key ingredient that is paralyzing the nation and making any kind of “meeting in the middle” absolutely impossible.

Our current president (Obama) said as much during his first meeting with congressional republicans, telling them that because they, and their talk-show-host idols who have been allowed to essentially dictate policy for the republican party, have so demonized the left…have painted them with such a starkly evil brush that it makes any sort of compromise position with them an impossibility, and because of that, we wind up with an exceedingly polarized position. Two camps with opposite views on what the way forward should look like, and both sides have so demonized the other than it would be political suicide to reach out to them and make a compromise.

Because of that, no compromise is ever reached (witness the doings of the self-described “Party of No”), political discourse resembles honest political debate less and less, becoming all the more divisive, and creating a vicious circle that cannot have a good ending for ‘We, the People.’

The only solution to this is to admit that both sides have mischaracterized their opponents. That neither side is bent on destroying the nation, and that both sides have something to offer to the political debate, should we ever reach the point that we can say that word and have it mean something besides ‘shouting match that happens to be about politics.’

There must be at least a measure of civility present for political debate to even take place.

We don’t have to agree with each other. Hell, we don’t even have to like each other, but we should be able to listen to each other’s ideas and gain something from them without branding the other side as a traitor to his nation, mentally deficient, or unworthy to live here.

If we can’t do at least that, then how can we honestly say we are participating in political debate at all? How can we honestly say we are deserving of the legacy that our founding fathers have left us?

There’s likely no bigger item making the rounds of political news sources these days than our (desperate) need to balance the national budget.

As a fiscal conservative myself, I echo these sentiments, but since the politicians currently in office seem more-or-less unconcerned about it, and since the “Party of No” didn’t have a much better track record when THEY last held power (counting the stuff that Bush kept off the books, the deficit was $1.7 Trillion when Obama took office, vs. his budget of $1.9 Trillion, so the two are virtually identical from a fiscal standpoint), I’ve decided to take it upon myself to do it for them.

What follows then, is my plan to immediately (as of the 2010 budget) balance the national budget and give us a small surplus which we can use to begin retiring our massive debt.

I have no doubt that there isn’t a politician alive with the balls to actually take this proposal and run with it, but if such a man or woman DID exist…that, my friends, would be political news worth reporting!

The changes this document proposes will most assuredly not be popular, and would be savagely resisted if anyone were ever to seriously propose them, but they would most assuredly get the job done, which is probably why no one will ever take them seriously.

That said, here’s my plan of attack:

At the present time, we are running a 1.9 Trillion Dollar deficit in our federal budget, so through some combination of tax increases and service reductions, we need to come up with this dollar amount. Actually, I’m going to be shooting for cool 2 Trillion dollars, which will give us at least some money to begin retiring the debt. Retiring the debt will ease our interest burden, which, if we use that additional savings to ALSO retire debt, will see us in a slowly improving financial position, and wouldn’t that be refreshing!

So…the first thing: Effective immediately, stop all corporate welfare, which amounts to some $140 Billion dollars a year (this number based on the 92B 2006 data available, and taking the lower estimate of corporate welfare sucked from states, which is then made up for by the federal government infusing money into the states to keep them from going bankrupt). Corporations routinely take advantage of generous tax breaks while the tax holidays are in effect, only to shut down operations the day the holidays expire, and yet, this never manages to make the political news segments of ANY of the major networks. . This is a case of what’s good for the goose is good for the gander, and it’s time for big business to pony up, so…no more subsidies. Hand over that cash! (note, the $92B could be as high as 125B, see http://www.virginia-organizing.org/articles/corporate_welfare.php) – I wasn’t sure where these figures came from, so I didn’t use them, but if accurate, this could add another $33B a year to the ultimate savings, below).

Second, let’s start holding companies fully accountable for cleaning up their own damned messes. This would free up an estimated additional 100 billion dollars a year, so in two strokes of the pen, we’ve already dealt a significant blow to the shortfall. (Running total: $240B)

Third, audit the government top-to-bottom. Wasteful spending ALONE make up a staggering (est.) $410 Billion of spending, and this is the so-called “low hanging fruit” that’s easy to recoup. (Running total: $650B)

When you factor in redundant departments and things better handled by states (Federal oversight and state-level implementations), you can recoup an additional ~$200B (Running total: $850B)

Fourth, military spending, and spending related TO the military. This amounts to an estimated $1.4 Trillion (http://www.warresisters.org/pages/piechart.htm). Let’s slice a cool 10% from this, recouping a neat $140B, and don’t worry, we’ll still be spending more than the next dozen or so nations combined, so I don’t think we’ll be in any immediate danger. ;) (running total = $990B).

Fifth, we’ll slice social security and medicare by an equal measure (10%), and do this hand in hand with pushing the retirement age to 70, so as to preserve the solidity of the trust, and to hold true to the original vision of the safety net (when it was implemented, lifespans were significantly shorter than they are at present…social security was never designed to support mass millions for decades…this will help to remedy that without financially endangering current recipients. Also, we’ll implement a 1% increase in the FICA tax. Collectively then, this should save or raise somewhere in the neighborhood of $100B (Running total $1090B).

Fifth, Close loopholes in corporate tax policies, increasing revenues to the tune of an estimated $100B (again, this benefit is mostly to the states, which means that the federal government still gets to count the benefit, as the federal government is not shelling out money to support the bankrupted states). (Running total $1190B)

Sixth, begin strenuously enforcing the “2-years and you’re out” program re: welfare. Hand in hand with this, allow some federal funds to flow into charitable organizations to help them become a viable secondary layer of the national safety net (estimated to save $80B) (Running total $1270B)

Ninth, increase estate taxes, and close loopholes on taxes for the wealthy, which should see revenues increase by approximately ~EST $150B. (Running total $1420B)

Tenth, explore the idea of taxing the Fed. I have no way of knowing if this plan is viable, and if so, how much money could potentially be raise here, but I don’t think it would hurt to ask the question and explore it honestly.

Eleventh, seek alternate methods of funding. Hire NASA experts and facilities out to private industries. We can lease spare satellite capacity to other countries, or even to private industry, should they have need of it. There’s at least $200B in income producing potential in the assets we have available (Running total: $1620B)

Twelfth: Raise income taxes and tariffs in line with the plans already on the table (the combination of tax breaks expiring and new taxes is slated to raise an additional ~$420B) (Running Total: $2040B, or, 2.004 Trillion Dollars). (note: could be as high as $2073B in total savings, see above, the entry on corporate welfare)

We could do this next year.

If this report ever surfaces in or on the political news segments of any of the major networks, I’d be shocked. If any politician (at ANY level) read it and started talking about the merits of anything found here, I’d likely keel over dead in surprise (which is a think I am certain many of my readers would not object to ;) ), but no worries. It won’t happen, because our current breed of politician was born without conscience or spinal column. In short, they will ride this train until it collides with the mountain of fiscal irresponsibility. Maybe a couple decades of German-style hyperinflation will cure us. I truly hope it doesn’t come to that, but it probably will, because our political news analysts simply aren’t talking about this stuff in any serious kind of way. Simply put, no one can be arsed to care, and that’s a shame.

If finance and budgets are your strong suit, consider earning an online master degree in
accounting
.

Sound off! If you have something to say about anything you’ve read here, then we invite you to participate in our political forums!

References:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_welfare

http://hoguenews.com/?p=4834

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_%28United_States%29

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1868

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=2655

http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/obama_schedules_massive_new_tax_hikes_for_2010/

http://www.virginia-organizing.org/articles/corporate_welfare.php