Political Debate – Where Has All the Civility Gone?

There was a day when political debate carried with it the notion of civility. That it was possible to hold a political debate with a rival (even one from the opposite side of the political landscape) and hold an issues-driven conversation. Impassioned, certainly, but it used to be possible to hold a passionate conversation on any topic (political debate or otherwise) without seeing it devolve into mud slinging and name calling. Without seeing the parties from both sides stomp off in frustration and disgust, absolutely convinced that the person on the other side of the debate is a first rate moron (in the best case), or a traitorous enemy of his country (in the worst).

To say that this situation is not conducive to CONSTRUCTIVE political debate is understatement at its most sublime, and I would contend that it is, in fact, the key ingredient that is paralyzing the nation and making any kind of “meeting in the middle” absolutely impossible.

Our current president (Obama) said as much during his first meeting with congressional republicans, telling them that because they, and their talk-show-host idols who have been allowed to essentially dictate policy for the republican party, have so demonized the left…have painted them with such a starkly evil brush that it makes any sort of compromise position with them an impossibility, and because of that, we wind up with an exceedingly polarized position. Two camps with opposite views on what the way forward should look like, and both sides have so demonized the other than it would be political suicide to reach out to them and make a compromise.

Because of that, no compromise is ever reached (witness the doings of the self-described “Party of No”), political discourse resembles honest political debate less and less, becoming all the more divisive, and creating a vicious circle that cannot have a good ending for ‘We, the People.’

The only solution to this is to admit that both sides have mischaracterized their opponents. That neither side is bent on destroying the nation, and that both sides have something to offer to the political debate, should we ever reach the point that we can say that word and have it mean something besides ‘shouting match that happens to be about politics.’

There must be at least a measure of civility present for political debate to even take place.

We don’t have to agree with each other. Hell, we don’t even have to like each other, but we should be able to listen to each other’s ideas and gain something from them without branding the other side as a traitor to his nation, mentally deficient, or unworthy to live here.

If we can’t do at least that, then how can we honestly say we are participating in political debate at all? How can we honestly say we are deserving of the legacy that our founding fathers have left us?

There’s likely no bigger item making the rounds of political news sources these days than our (desperate) need to balance the national budget.

As a fiscal conservative myself, I echo these sentiments, but since the politicians currently in office seem more-or-less unconcerned about it, and since the “Party of No” didn’t have a much better track record when THEY last held power (counting the stuff that Bush kept off the books, the deficit was $1.7 Trillion when Obama took office, vs. his budget of $1.9 Trillion, so the two are virtually identical from a fiscal standpoint), I’ve decided to take it upon myself to do it for them.

What follows then, is my plan to immediately (as of the 2010 budget) balance the national budget and give us a small surplus which we can use to begin retiring our massive debt.

I have no doubt that there isn’t a politician alive with the balls to actually take this proposal and run with it, but if such a man or woman DID exist…that, my friends, would be political news worth reporting!

The changes this document proposes will most assuredly not be popular, and would be savagely resisted if anyone were ever to seriously propose them, but they would most assuredly get the job done, which is probably why no one will ever take them seriously.

That said, here’s my plan of attack:

At the present time, we are running a 1.9 Trillion Dollar deficit in our federal budget, so through some combination of tax increases and service reductions, we need to come up with this dollar amount. Actually, I’m going to be shooting for cool 2 Trillion dollars, which will give us at least some money to begin retiring the debt. Retiring the debt will ease our interest burden, which, if we use that additional savings to ALSO retire debt, will see us in a slowly improving financial position, and wouldn’t that be refreshing!

So…the first thing: Effective immediately, stop all corporate welfare, which amounts to some $140 Billion dollars a year (this number based on the 92B 2006 data available, and taking the lower estimate of corporate welfare sucked from states, which is then made up for by the federal government infusing money into the states to keep them from going bankrupt). Corporations routinely take advantage of generous tax breaks while the tax holidays are in effect, only to shut down operations the day the holidays expire, and yet, this never manages to make the political news segments of ANY of the major networks. . This is a case of what’s good for the goose is good for the gander, and it’s time for big business to pony up, so…no more subsidies. Hand over that cash! (note, the $92B could be as high as 125B, see http://www.virginia-organizing.org/articles/corporate_welfare.php) – I wasn’t sure where these figures came from, so I didn’t use them, but if accurate, this could add another $33B a year to the ultimate savings, below).

Second, let’s start holding companies fully accountable for cleaning up their own damned messes. This would free up an estimated additional 100 billion dollars a year, so in two strokes of the pen, we’ve already dealt a significant blow to the shortfall. (Running total: $240B)

Third, audit the government top-to-bottom. Wasteful spending ALONE make up a staggering (est.) $410 Billion of spending, and this is the so-called “low hanging fruit” that’s easy to recoup. (Running total: $650B)

When you factor in redundant departments and things better handled by states (Federal oversight and state-level implementations), you can recoup an additional ~$200B (Running total: $850B)

Fourth, military spending, and spending related TO the military. This amounts to an estimated $1.4 Trillion (http://www.warresisters.org/pages/piechart.htm). Let’s slice a cool 10% from this, recouping a neat $140B, and don’t worry, we’ll still be spending more than the next dozen or so nations combined, so I don’t think we’ll be in any immediate danger. ;) (running total = $990B).

Fifth, we’ll slice social security and medicare by an equal measure (10%), and do this hand in hand with pushing the retirement age to 70, so as to preserve the solidity of the trust, and to hold true to the original vision of the safety net (when it was implemented, lifespans were significantly shorter than they are at present…social security was never designed to support mass millions for decades…this will help to remedy that without financially endangering current recipients. Also, we’ll implement a 1% increase in the FICA tax. Collectively then, this should save or raise somewhere in the neighborhood of $100B (Running total $1090B).

Fifth, Close loopholes in corporate tax policies, increasing revenues to the tune of an estimated $100B (again, this benefit is mostly to the states, which means that the federal government still gets to count the benefit, as the federal government is not shelling out money to support the bankrupted states). (Running total $1190B)

Sixth, begin strenuously enforcing the “2-years and you’re out” program re: welfare. Hand in hand with this, allow some federal funds to flow into charitable organizations to help them become a viable secondary layer of the national safety net (estimated to save $80B) (Running total $1270B)

Ninth, increase estate taxes, and close loopholes on taxes for the wealthy, which should see revenues increase by approximately ~EST $150B. (Running total $1420B)

Tenth, explore the idea of taxing the Fed. I have no way of knowing if this plan is viable, and if so, how much money could potentially be raise here, but I don’t think it would hurt to ask the question and explore it honestly.

Eleventh, seek alternate methods of funding. Hire NASA experts and facilities out to private industries. We can lease spare satellite capacity to other countries, or even to private industry, should they have need of it. There’s at least $200B in income producing potential in the assets we have available (Running total: $1620B)

Twelfth: Raise income taxes and tariffs in line with the plans already on the table (the combination of tax breaks expiring and new taxes is slated to raise an additional ~$420B) (Running Total: $2040B, or, 2.004 Trillion Dollars). (note: could be as high as $2073B in total savings, see above, the entry on corporate welfare)

We could do this next year.

If this report ever surfaces in or on the political news segments of any of the major networks, I’d be shocked. If any politician (at ANY level) read it and started talking about the merits of anything found here, I’d likely keel over dead in surprise (which is a think I am certain many of my readers would not object to ;) ), but no worries. It won’t happen, because our current breed of politician was born without conscience or spinal column. In short, they will ride this train until it collides with the mountain of fiscal irresponsibility. Maybe a couple decades of German-style hyperinflation will cure us. I truly hope it doesn’t come to that, but it probably will, because our political news analysts simply aren’t talking about this stuff in any serious kind of way. Simply put, no one can be arsed to care, and that’s a shame.

If finance and budgets are your strong suit, consider earning an online master degree in
accounting
.

Sound off! If you have something to say about anything you’ve read here, then we invite you to participate in our political forums!

References:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_welfare

http://hoguenews.com/?p=4834

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_%28United_States%29

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1868

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=2655

http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/obama_schedules_massive_new_tax_hikes_for_2010/

http://www.virginia-organizing.org/articles/corporate_welfare.php